Skip to main content
Join our international virtual conference on Dec. 5, 2024! Learn more & register here.
Join our international virtual conference on Dec. 5, 2024! Learn more & register here. ×

Legal Considerations

Rethinking Democracy: Legal Challenges to Pornography and Sex Inequality in Canada and the US

Rethinking Democracy: Legal Challenges to Pornography and Sex Inequality in Canada and the United StatesFull Article Title: Rethinking Democracy: Legal Challenges to Pornography and Sex Inequality in Canada and the United States

Open Access: No

Abstract

Why are democracies unresponsive to well-documented injuries in the production and by the consumption of pornography? Legal challenges to pornography in Canada and the United States in which sexual subordination, not moral notions of “obscenity,” were the driving rationale, show democracies inadequately recognizing gender-specific harms. Changes in Canadian obscenity doctrines to account for harm and inequality, in contrast with the U.S. reign of “free speech,” did not deliver a corresponding change on the ground. Developments in democratic theory, international law, and the particular U.S.—Canadian legal trajectory, and consideration of the void of institutions articulating the interests of those victimized in and by pornography, suggest the need to adopt empowering civil remedies.

Citation

Waltman, M. (2010). Rethinking democracy: Legal challenges to pornography and sex inequality in Canada and the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 63(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909349627